|
|
|
Setup Scenario :
The following table contains the summary results of a 9KM test that we have
recently conducted. We compared the throughput performance of our full product MMJ5N26
using 11n 5GHz 26dBm radios. The antenna
use is MMJ2's built-in 17 dBi dual-polarization antenna. A pair of other made Brand "U" M5 is used as benchmark reference.
Result :
- On the other hand, MMJ5N26 is significantly better
than Brand "U" M5 in every test combination. MMJ5N26 outperforms Brand "U" M5
by over 15% in throughput.
- It has better priced than Brand "U" M5
Conclusion :
Value for money, Good performance, Good choice "MMJ5N26"
|
AP |
Client |
Throughput (Mbps) |
|
HT40 |
HT20 |
HT10 |
HT5 |
|
MMJ5N26 |
MMJ5N26 |
86.2 |
53.9 |
26.2 |
15.1 |
|
MMJ5N26 |
Brand “U” M5 |
71.5 |
48.6 |
23 |
11.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brand “U” M5 |
MMJ5N26 |
71.1 |
40.8 |
20.5 |
10.7 |
|
Brand “U” M5 |
Brand “U” M5 |
69.3 |
37.7 |
18.6 |
8.8 |
Notes:
1. Test channel 5.180GHz
2. Test distance 8.9 KM
3. MMJ5N26 with internal 17 dBi dual polarization
antenna
4. Band "U" M5 - 5GHz 11n wireless outdoor unit
|